USA: 65-year-old Don Samuelson, a college professor teaching in FDA University of Florida, USA was arrested on criminal harassment shame on their female students. Mr. Samuelson has used its special pens equipped USB camera embedded in its female students wearing short.
Showing posts with label World News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World News. Show all posts
Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra's Statement on the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC)'s charges over the Rice Pledging Scheme
Respected fellow Thai citizens and dear rice farmers,
I wish to begin by reaffirming that over the past two years since being appointed Prime Minister, I have been committed to serve the people of Thailand with honesty, integrity and every determined effort, as I have always been conscious of the mandate entrusted to me by the Thai people. I shall therefore not let them down; in particular the responsibility to protect the interests of the Thai people and uphold our democratic system with His Majesty the King as the Head of State.
Since the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) has resolved to investigate into the matter upon petition by the Democrat Party, and in the case that the NACC has persistently expressed reason to suspect corruption involved with the Rice Pledging Scheme since 28 January 2014, thereby causing damage to the government; and with the subsequent announcement on 31 January 2014 informing me of this investigation, with the entire NACC making up the investigating committee and the delegating of Professor Vicha Mahakul and Mr.Prasart Pongsiwapai as the responsible committee members for this investigation through an official note which also confirmed that I shall be accorded full rights, treated fairly and transparently in the judicial process by NACC,
I initially believed the NACC, as in consideration of the current position I hold as Prime Minister, that I will be accorded fair and just treatment and that sufficient witness and evidence will be considered throughout the procedures in the reporting of allegations, even though the law specifies that the NACC proceeds promptly, but without rush, in accommodating justice for the accused.
Fellow Citizens
My work as Prime Minister and also as Chairperson of the National Rice Policy Committee is done at the policy level. While at the operational level, the implementation of the Rice Pledging Scheme requires the establishment of a framework, steps, and procedures by government agencies and officials in accordance with the policy direction given.
The government system of work has its own standards and regulations; therefore my work at the policy level does not have the authority to directly operate, order, or overrule the work of government officials in anyway. The implementation of projects involved with a policy must be in accordance with a Cabinet Resolution and must be based on Government Policy as announced to the House of Representatives, stipulated in Articles 171 and 178 of the Constitution of Thailand. I have always been aware that government work and private sector work must be based on such principles and with clear delegation of duties so that there is accountability in all related issues and accountability in each procedure.
Therefore, as there will be an announcement over the investigations into myself and although I have not been involved at the operational level, but nevertheless as I am being accused, I am compelled to exercise my rights within judicial procedures and therefore ask to examine the evidence and witnesses, in accordance with my rights in the judicial procedure as guaranteed by the Constitution of Thailand, so that I can correctly explain such accusations that I have not been involved in any wrongdoing to the NACC.
I have also submitted two official petition notes to the NACC since 11 February 2014, asking them to kindly consider reassigning any other NACC member to undertake the task of investigation, instead of Professor Vicha Mahakul.
However, since that day, I have not been informed by the NACC that my two above-mentioned petitions for justice would be considered or not. Instead, on 18 February 2014, the NACC, through a press briefing by the NACC member that I wished to be substituted, announced that I have been called on 27 February 2014, at 14.00 hrs. to be notified of the charges. If one considers the duration since the NACC assigned its member to investigate the case on 28 January 2014 until the recent announcement on 18 February 2014, it is only just 21 days. This short duration that the NACC used to investigate a political case has never happened before.
Another observation is that a cabinet member in the last government has been charged with corruption on many counts, including corruption charges on their rice insurance scheme. Surprisingly, there has been no judicial development regarding that particular case, whereas it takes only 21 days to investigate and bring charges against me.
My fellow Thai citizens,
I wish to assure you that as I have served my duty with righteousness and contrary to the charges brought against me by the NACC, I have done nothing wrong. On the charges that I did not stop this Rice Pledging Scheme Policy and allowed the scheme to continue, I wish to prove once again that the Scheme will definitely be beneficial to the farmers as it has raised the living standards of our fellow farmers. And though I may be charged in this criminal case and may have to give up my position in accordance to the wishes of those who want to topple my government, I will still lend my full cooperation and give necessary information to the NACC. It is also my fervent hope that the NACC will listen to all accounts of the witnesses before delivering their verdict. The judicial process, under the rule of law, would provide the best opportunity for the accused to prove oneself.
More importantly, if there were indeed true justice without any hidden agenda, the NACC would not have hurriedly investigated and delivered a verdict in such a manner that has allowed society to deem it as beneficial only to those who want to topple the government. And in comparison to previous cases that I have mentioned earlier, for example the rice scheme of the previous government, which is still under investigation since 2013 and other long impending cases such as the bail out of financial institutions from the 1997 economic crisis.
The NACC should prove to the public that it has used its power righteously, in accordance with the principles of the rule of law as stated under the constitution.
Lastly, I urge our dear farmers and the people of Thailand not to be disheartened by this ongoing dilemma. We shall solve this problem and overcome all other obstacles together. I am ready to listen and cooperate with every party to bring about the truth, the effectiveness and productivity of the Rice Pledging Scheme and whether it would really benefit the farmers. Should there be any need to amend the Scheme to be more effective, I am more than welcome as this would truly benefit every single Thai citizen.
Thank you very much.
https://www.facebook.com/Y.Shinawatra/posts/730247433686381:0
I wish to begin by reaffirming that over the past two years since being appointed Prime Minister, I have been committed to serve the people of Thailand with honesty, integrity and every determined effort, as I have always been conscious of the mandate entrusted to me by the Thai people. I shall therefore not let them down; in particular the responsibility to protect the interests of the Thai people and uphold our democratic system with His Majesty the King as the Head of State.
Since the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) has resolved to investigate into the matter upon petition by the Democrat Party, and in the case that the NACC has persistently expressed reason to suspect corruption involved with the Rice Pledging Scheme since 28 January 2014, thereby causing damage to the government; and with the subsequent announcement on 31 January 2014 informing me of this investigation, with the entire NACC making up the investigating committee and the delegating of Professor Vicha Mahakul and Mr.Prasart Pongsiwapai as the responsible committee members for this investigation through an official note which also confirmed that I shall be accorded full rights, treated fairly and transparently in the judicial process by NACC,
I initially believed the NACC, as in consideration of the current position I hold as Prime Minister, that I will be accorded fair and just treatment and that sufficient witness and evidence will be considered throughout the procedures in the reporting of allegations, even though the law specifies that the NACC proceeds promptly, but without rush, in accommodating justice for the accused.
Fellow Citizens
My work as Prime Minister and also as Chairperson of the National Rice Policy Committee is done at the policy level. While at the operational level, the implementation of the Rice Pledging Scheme requires the establishment of a framework, steps, and procedures by government agencies and officials in accordance with the policy direction given.
The government system of work has its own standards and regulations; therefore my work at the policy level does not have the authority to directly operate, order, or overrule the work of government officials in anyway. The implementation of projects involved with a policy must be in accordance with a Cabinet Resolution and must be based on Government Policy as announced to the House of Representatives, stipulated in Articles 171 and 178 of the Constitution of Thailand. I have always been aware that government work and private sector work must be based on such principles and with clear delegation of duties so that there is accountability in all related issues and accountability in each procedure.
Therefore, as there will be an announcement over the investigations into myself and although I have not been involved at the operational level, but nevertheless as I am being accused, I am compelled to exercise my rights within judicial procedures and therefore ask to examine the evidence and witnesses, in accordance with my rights in the judicial procedure as guaranteed by the Constitution of Thailand, so that I can correctly explain such accusations that I have not been involved in any wrongdoing to the NACC.
I have also submitted two official petition notes to the NACC since 11 February 2014, asking them to kindly consider reassigning any other NACC member to undertake the task of investigation, instead of Professor Vicha Mahakul.
However, since that day, I have not been informed by the NACC that my two above-mentioned petitions for justice would be considered or not. Instead, on 18 February 2014, the NACC, through a press briefing by the NACC member that I wished to be substituted, announced that I have been called on 27 February 2014, at 14.00 hrs. to be notified of the charges. If one considers the duration since the NACC assigned its member to investigate the case on 28 January 2014 until the recent announcement on 18 February 2014, it is only just 21 days. This short duration that the NACC used to investigate a political case has never happened before.
Another observation is that a cabinet member in the last government has been charged with corruption on many counts, including corruption charges on their rice insurance scheme. Surprisingly, there has been no judicial development regarding that particular case, whereas it takes only 21 days to investigate and bring charges against me.
My fellow Thai citizens,
I wish to assure you that as I have served my duty with righteousness and contrary to the charges brought against me by the NACC, I have done nothing wrong. On the charges that I did not stop this Rice Pledging Scheme Policy and allowed the scheme to continue, I wish to prove once again that the Scheme will definitely be beneficial to the farmers as it has raised the living standards of our fellow farmers. And though I may be charged in this criminal case and may have to give up my position in accordance to the wishes of those who want to topple my government, I will still lend my full cooperation and give necessary information to the NACC. It is also my fervent hope that the NACC will listen to all accounts of the witnesses before delivering their verdict. The judicial process, under the rule of law, would provide the best opportunity for the accused to prove oneself.
More importantly, if there were indeed true justice without any hidden agenda, the NACC would not have hurriedly investigated and delivered a verdict in such a manner that has allowed society to deem it as beneficial only to those who want to topple the government. And in comparison to previous cases that I have mentioned earlier, for example the rice scheme of the previous government, which is still under investigation since 2013 and other long impending cases such as the bail out of financial institutions from the 1997 economic crisis.
The NACC should prove to the public that it has used its power righteously, in accordance with the principles of the rule of law as stated under the constitution.
Lastly, I urge our dear farmers and the people of Thailand not to be disheartened by this ongoing dilemma. We shall solve this problem and overcome all other obstacles together. I am ready to listen and cooperate with every party to bring about the truth, the effectiveness and productivity of the Rice Pledging Scheme and whether it would really benefit the farmers. Should there be any need to amend the Scheme to be more effective, I am more than welcome as this would truly benefit every single Thai citizen.
Thank you very much.
https://www.facebook.com/Y.Shinawatra/posts/730247433686381:0
Labels:
World News
Pouttho! Parents indulge children Photographers wild Conner Without fear danger to nothing [VIDEO]
This is a lovely view Ironically Which showed a family Let their children Crane out of the window of the car To capture wild lion Sleeping on the street, in a zoo.
Labels:
World News
Localizing treatment for emotional trauma in Cambodia
BANGKOK, 24 January 2014 (IRIN) - More than three decades after an estimated two million Cambodians died in a genocide perpetrated by the Khmer Rouge, post-traumatic stress disorder and other forms of emotional trauma continue to prey on the peace of mind of survivors and their descendants, say mental health experts who are advocating culturally adaptive trauma treatment.
“There are differences in human responses to trauma, and it is important to address the idioms of distress and cultural narratives in the response,” said Sandra Mattar, an associate professor of trauma at St. Mary's College of California.
“There are differences in human responses to trauma, and it is important to address the idioms of distress and cultural narratives in the response,” said Sandra Mattar, an associate professor of trauma at St. Mary's College of California.
Siem Reap Province in northwestern Cambodia borders an area that was once a Khmer Rouge stronghold. Before the genocide, which took place between 1975 and 1979, it was also the site of overspill bombing from the war in neighbouring Vietnam. Almost half of the province’s population suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), according to a recent study published in the International Journal of Psychiatry.
PTSD began to be mentioned in the mid-1970s and was recognized by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1980, with the criteria revised in 2013. Exposure to a traumatic event can trigger PTSD, which is characterized by persistent re-experiencing of that event, avoidance and emotional numbing, persistent hyperarousal including a high level of anxiety, and hypervigilance, among other symptoms.
These general criteria have been widely adopted internationally, causing experts to call for “adaptive” treatments in different contexts. While Cambodian psychiatrists say the fusion of psychotherapy and Buddhist ways of dealing with grief have helped address the emotional trauma of some people, widespread poverty and limited mental healthcare have stalled mental health progress and contributed to transgenerational trauma, in which trauma is passed from one generation to the next.
“Trauma [that is not dealt with] can transfer from the first generation to the second. It is in the way they raise their children, [their] aggressiveness [and] inappropriate reactions,” said Muny Sothara, a psychologist with the Cambodian Transcultural Psychosocial Organization (TPO), an NGO providing mental health treatment, based in the capital, Phnom Penh.
Tailoring treatment
“We should not assume that treatments developed for PTSD in the West are helpful or useful in non-Western contexts,” said Mattar, who wrote a report on training traumatologists in culturally adaptive methods in 2010. Trauma therapy based solely on talking and medication runs the risk of “eclipsing the mechanisms that [the] culture has around resilience and coping,” she said.
In North America, PTSD treatment often consists of cognitive behavioural therapy and/or medication, but these treatments do not address the role of the deceased, who many Cambodians believe are responsible for their mental health ailments, according to TPO.
Many Cambodians diagnosed with PTSD believe their frequent sleep disturbances occur because the spirits of their deceased loved ones are not at rest. “They have sleep difficulties, and pain, mostly pain in the heart, feeling numb in the heart,” said Sothara, who said patients interpret pain, insomnia and nightmares as signs of the unsettled afterlife of their dead relatives.
Cambodia is a mainly Buddhist country and it is widely believed that the monks are able to communicate with the deceased. TPO has incorporated Buddhist ceremonies, in which families testify about the deaths of their loved ones before monks in a pagoda, into conventional psychotherapeutic treatments such as counselling and, if necessary, medication.
“The ceremony provides the opportunity for them [survivors] to connect with dead relatives, to show the dead that they are fighting for them, they are doing something for them,” said Sothara, who noted that Buddhist ceremonies alone are insufficient to treat some cases of trauma, which is where conventional treatments, including psychotherapy, can help.
“The most important issue is that they [survivors] - and only they - are the ones to make the decision [about] if and when and to who[m] they want to tell their experience,” said Beini Ye, a lawyer with the Cambodian Defenders Project (CDP), an NGO representing survivors before an ongoing tribunal in which Khmer Rouge officials stand accused of war crimes. “For some, the decision to not disclose anything is the path to psychological healing.”
Poverty makes it worse
The consequences of PTSD are aggravated by poverty, which may be a stronger predictor of the severity of the disorder than the trauma event itself, suggested a 2010 study by US psychiatrists Devon Hinton and Roberto Lewis-Fernandez.
“If you add factors such as the impact of poverty, social and political instability, and poor access to resources, you have a recipe for non-stop cycles of victimization and violence, with no room for trust development or healing opportunities,” said Mattar.
An estimated 20 to 25 percent of women and young girls in Cambodia are victims of domestic violence, according to the Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association, as noted in a 2012 report by the New York-based Leitner Centre for International Law and Justice.
Ye said most people's psychological wounds have been untreated for decades, compounding the severity of their current distress.
Almost 46 percent of Cambodians live in “multidimensional” poverty - a UN measurement that considers multiple deprivations in health, education and living standards - according to the UN Development Programme in 2013.
In 2012, the government spent US$300,000 on mental healthcare, which amounted to $0.02 per person, far short of the $0.20 other low-income countries spent per capita in 2011, the most recent year analyzed by the World Health Organization.
The Leitner Centre for International Law and Justice noted, “The devastation of the Khmer Rouge regime is not solely responsible for the continued presence and impact of many determinants of poor mental health in Cambodia.”
dm/pt/he
Theme (s): Health & Nutrition,
[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]
Labels:
World News
Thai PM Ying Luck Urges Army to Help Manage the Election Situation
Thai Prime Minister Yingluck urges army to help managing the situation of elections on February 2 while the lawsuit asked the constitutional court for consideration when voting canned and Bangkok are in times of disaster. Please find out more.
Labels:
World News
ឆ្កែដ៏ខ្លាហាន លះបង់ជិវិតដើម្បីការពារម្ចាស់ The Dog Hero
Dogs are very Loyal Creatures. They accompany their owners, give them enjoyment of their presence and at times even risk their lives for those who care for them. Kabang , a family dog from Philippines, saved two children from being hit by a speedy motorcycle. Kabang sacrificed herself , blocking the route of motorcycle. As a result , she was badly injured, losing a part of her face and jaw. Local Vets said that the family could leave the dog in their hands for Euthanasia. The family refused and took care of the injured animal themselves.
Labels:
World News
Thailand: The mechanics of a state of emergency
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- Thailand has a long history of civil unrest, with dozens of governments since 1946
- The state of emergency invokes the same powers that were used in the bloody crackdown of 2010
- The 60-day clampdown gives the government wide-ranging powers to maintain public order
- Large investors such as Toyota have said continuing unrest could damage the Thai economy
(CNN) -- Thailand is no stranger to civil unrest -- just four years ago the same emergency laws brought in this week were used to end political protests that left scores dead and thousands injured.
While this year's state of emergency may not differ in substance, it is being projected by the government of Yingluck Shinawatra as different in style.
The 60-day clampdown gives the government the power to implement curfews, censor the news media, disperse gatherings and use military force to "secure order."
Analysts say in this respect it is no different to the law that Suthep Thaugsuban -- a former deputy prime minister who is now leading anti-government protests -- used in 2010 to bring a violent end to months of protests in the capital Bangkok.
But this time, the government says it has no plans to crack down on the protesters that have disrupted the capital Bangkok for weeks.
Labor Minister Chalerm Yoobamrung, who will oversee the joint operation between the military and the police, told a press conference this week the government would not use weapons and would not attempt to disperse protesters at night.
In 2010, the military's attempt to clear protester encampments at night was widely held to have been responsible for the high death toll of around 80 people.
The use of the police as a stabilizing force in the deadlock has been widely seen as an attempt by the government to inject a civilian element into the state of emergency. In recent weeks, the government has been praised by foreign governments, including the United States, for its restraint in handling the protests.
Despite this, human rights groups fear the state of emergency could boil over if protesters -- who aim to disrupt elections scheduled for February 2 and want to institute an unelected "people's council" to run the country ahead of a political overhaul -- ratchet up the pressure.
"This is the same piece of legislation with the same powers," Phil Robertson of Human Rights Watch told CNN. "Her (Yingluck Shinawatra) powers are not limited by this."
"While she says she will not use these powers immediately, it will very much depend on the situation," he said. "If she felt that the protesters were instigating violence to stop the elections, she might use some of these powers.
"Our view is that we're concerned that this (the state of emergency) will be viewed as an escalation by the protesters, but on the other hand governments do have a responsibility to maintain some sense of law and order.
"As long as they do this in a rights-friendly way, I don't think people will complain about it. Everything will swing on what happens next."
While Thailand has said it remains open for business despite the state of emergency, the US State Department issued a travel alert for Thailand this week, warning U.S. citizens of the "unpredictable and ongoing demonstration activity" ahead of the elections.
According to the Tourism Authority of Thailand, a total of 34 countries and regions have issued travel warnings for Thailand, including China, France, Australia and Japan.
The protests have already rattled the nerves of some of Thailand's biggest investors. On Monday, the president of Toyota's Thailand unit Kyoichi Tanada told a press conference the company may reconsider up to 20 billion baht ($609 million) in investment -- and could even cut production -- if political unrest continues.
As long as they do this in a rights friendly way, I don't think people will complain about it
Phil Robertson, Human Rights Watch
"For new foreign investors, the political situation may force them to look for opportunity elsewhere. For those that have already invested, like Toyota, we will not go away. But whether we will invest (further) or not, we are not sure."
Thailand is the biggest auto market in Southeast Asia and is a production and export hub for car manufacturers such as Honda Motor Company and Ford.
Despite political instability, Thailand has shown formidable economic growth over the past decade and is still attracting foreign investment from small to medium-sized enterprises.
In 2010, the medium-sized design company Design World Partnership decided to remain in Bangkok despite having its office windows shot out during the crackdown.
"We have to take the long view. If you look at the view over the past five to ten years the growth in Thailand has been phenomenal," Brenton Mauriello, DWP Chief Executive Officer, told CNN.
"Of course it would be better if it wasn't there and in the short-term our business has been affected but it's not catastrophic," he said. "You don't come to a country like Thailand and invest over a three or four-month period -- it's a long-term commitment."
He said that his company was expecting the situation to resolve itself and that by April or May it would be business as usual.
"We are now starting to invest back into Australia," said Mauriello, whose company began in Australia, established itself in Thailand in 1994 and and now has nine offices and 450 staff worldwide. "I think that shows that if we can do it, anyone can."
Labels:
World News
Dispute Continues Over Death Reports in Western Burma
BANGKOK — The Burmese government continues to reject reports that at least 24 people were killed in a violent incident involving ethnic minority Rohingyas in the country’s remote northwest earlier this month. Rights groups and news agencies have reported scores of Rohingya died in a crackdown by security forces that drew concern from the U.S. Embassy. Details remain unclear about an incident that occurred in the early morning hours of January 14. Locals say they were unfairly targeted by security personnel, and then driven from their homes by a mob. But the government insists that a policeman was kidnapped by the villagers, and then likely killed. Since then, rights groups have interviewed people who say as many as 60 people, nearly all of them ethnic Rohingya, died when security forces and ethnic Rakhine
villagers retaliated for the kidnapping. The government says the Rohingya are alive but fled their village after the policeman’s death. Government's version Presidential spokesperson Ye Htut says villagers likely exaggerated the story because they were guilty of killing a police officer. "Nobody except the police sergeant [are] missing from in that incident. That's why we are trying to recover the body and find the people who committed that crime. No civilians from Rakhine or Bengali [Rohingya] are missing from that accident, because police refrained from firing in that mob and they only retreated from the village," said Ye Htut. The U.S. and other foreign governments have urged Burmese authorities to investigate the alleged deaths and abuses of the villagers. Ye Htut says they plan to investigate the death of the police sergeant. Local member of parliament Shwe Maung told VOA’s Burmese service that he has seen many conflicting reports about what happened, but some indicate that a violent incident and looting did occur. He says he has not been able to travel to the village itself, and is relying on reports from locals. He says a group of villagers captured a police officer, U Aung Kyaw Thein, from a patrolling police group. Then, they beat him and four other policemen escaped. At midnight, he says police came back to the village and searched for the police officer. The next day, a group of Rakhine villagers also came to that village and looted it. AP says report accurate The Associated Press and other news agencies reported multiple deaths in the incident. Burma’s Ministry of Information later disputed the AP story and said it fears false reports could fuel further violence. The Associated Press issued a statement saying it believes the story was reported accurately. It also urged the government to allow better access to the region. Like past reports of violence in remote parts of Burma’s Rakhine state, facts have been difficult to confirm because the government restricts access to outsiders. Senior researcher on Burma for Human Rights Watch, David Mathieson, told reporters at a news conference in Bangkok Tuesday that the confusion over what happened is a direct result of the government’s policies. "They've got a lot to hide. They've been hiding what they've been doing in Maundgaw and Buthitaung for decades," he said. "This is just another sad episode in what we know has been going on for 30 years. They basically lock down those townships and keep people there in such a miserable state that they will leave." Mathieson says researchers are convinced that a violent clash did occur, but they still are working to determine what exactly happened and how many people died.
Labels:
World News
Top Chinese Military Official Accused of Amassing Illegal Wealth
Chinese media are reporting on a rare publicized case of corruption in the army leadership. A Chinese general in charge of army logistics allegedly abused his power to amass dozens of homes, gold statues and expensive wine. The excesses of Lieutenant General Gu Junshan were uncovered by Caixin, a prominent magazine famous for its investigative reporting and extensive coverage of China's corruption scandals. The magazine reported that Gu's home in Puyang, a grey courtyard compound modeled after the Forbidden City in Beijing, was raided over a year ago. Police filled four trucks with Gu's expensive possessions, including a
golden boat, a golden basin and a golden statue of Mao. Residents of the village told Caixin that investigators spent two days seizing property from the residence, known in the village as the “General's Mansion,” but would only load trucks at night to avoid creating “dissatisfaction among the villagers.” According to the expose', Gu's brother lived in a house next door, and the two properties were connected through a 30-meter-long basement packed with “crates” of expensive Chinese wine. Chinese leaders have publicized their ongoing anti-graft efforts as a serious step at stemming corruption and have said they will intensify the campaign in 2014. But the details of Gu's wealth show that corruption in China can stretch beyond people's imagination, says Beijing University anti-corruption professor He Bing. He said the timing of the report in the first few weeks of the new year sends a powerful message. “The anti-graft effort has no forbidden spots,” he said, “A new year has started with Xi Jinping's pronouncements against corruption, and this report is a symbolic sign of that resolution.” Chinese leaders devoted numerous speeches and resources to fighting corruption last year. According to the country's top anti-graft body, such efforts were effective and led to the investigation and punishment of more than 182,000 party officials in 2013 for various extents of abuse of power. According to Caixin, Gu took advantage of his position as the manager of military real estate deals and building projects to benefit himself and other members of his family. Dozens of apartments Gu owned in central Beijing were destined to be given out as gifts, Caixin reported. Gu's alleged illegal wealth touches an especially sensitive nerve, given that he had made a career within the prestigious People's Liberation Army. On Friday, the Communist Party-controlled Global Times said in an editorial that Gu Junshan should be severely investigated. “The circumstances of the investigation should be disclosed and clarified to the public and the media,” the editorial read, ”Government corruption is an illness, but corruption within the armed forces is a danger.” So far, Gu has not been officially indicted, but rumors abound. As early as 2012, his name was removed from the website of the Ministry of Defense. In January 2013 came the house search detailed in Caixin's report, and a few months later a professor at the PLA National Defence University told state media that Gu was involved in a corruption case. The lack of an official statement by the party's disciplinary commission, which usually notifies the media after cadres are put under investigation, has led some to believe that Gu's case might go beyond his personal abuses of power. “Behind Gu Junshan there might be an even bigger tiger - or corrupt official,” wrote blogger Zhou Pengan. “Even if they are pursuing bigger cases, the anti-corruption body should not let a case drag on so long without resolution.” He Bing said that it is unclear why it's taking so long for authorities to announce the investigation, but he adds that with the media attention around the scandal it should not take long before Gu is officially indicted. “The anti-graft effort has no forbidden spots. A new year has started with Xi Jinping's pronouncements against corruption, and this report is a symbolic sign of that resolution,” He Bing stated.
Labels:
World News
Men psychiatric legend girls One On rooftops And forcing (Video Inside)
Labels:
World News
Thai Army Chief Calls for Calm as Security Bolstered in Bangkok
Thailand’s army chief called for calm after attacks on anti-government rallies in Bangkok injured 70 people, prompting authorities to consider declaring a state of emergency for the first time since 2010.
Two grenades exploded at a demonstration site in central Bangkok on Jan. 19, injuring 28, and a grenade attack on a protest rally on Jan. 17 killed one person and wounded 40 others, according to the Bangkok Emergency Medical Center.
Violence is increasing as Suthep Thaugsuban, a former opposition party lawmaker, steps up efforts to oust Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra before an election on Feb. 2. Suthep wants the government replaced with an unelected council that would change laws to prevent parties linked to Yingluck’s brother, former premier Thaksin Shinawatra, returning to power.
“People who incite violence should understand that the losses will create hatred,” army Chief Prayuth Chan-Ocha said yesterday. “I’m concerned this will make people lose trust in officials, and they will try to get the military involved.”
The risk of Thailand defaulting on its debt has risen to the highest since June 2012. The benchmark SET Index (SET) of stocks fell 0.4 percent yesterday and has slumped about 10 percent since the start of demonstrations at the end of October. The baht has retreated about 5 percent in that period.
‘Painful Period’
The government is assessing whether to declare a state of emergency to combat the violence, Yingluck said. The emergency decree bans gatherings of more than five people, allows detention without charge and gives soldiers immunity from prosecution. Suthep faces murder charges stemming from a 2010 military crackdown on pro-Thaksin demonstrators when he was deputy prime minister, the last time a state of emergency was used to combat political violence in the capital.
“I don’t want to go back to the painful period of 2010,” Prayuth said. “But the situation today is different. The situation hasn’t reached that point, so soldiers can’t come out to do anything. Everything depends on the situation.”
Thailand has had nine coups and more than 20 prime ministers since 1946. Prayuth earlier this month said that the “door” to a coup is neither open nor closed, raising speculation the army may step in if protests become violent.
Suthep’s critics have said he aims to create enough turmoil to spur the intervention of the military in a repeat of a 2006 coup that toppled Thaksin, whose allies have won the past five elections on support from rural northern and northeastern regions.
‘More Chaos’
The protesters, mostly middle-class Bangkokians and Democrat party supporters from southern provinces, say Yingluck’s government is illegitimate and run from abroad by Thaksin, who faces a two-year jail term for corruption if he returns in a case he says was politically motivated.
Nine people have been killed since anti-government protests began Oct. 31, including a man who died from injuries sustained in a Jan. 17 grenade attack on a protest march near Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University. Suthep blamed the government for the attack, while Foreign Minister Surapong Tovichakchaikul questioned a decision by organizers to change the rally route without giving the police enough time to ensure it was safe.
“It’s possible that we will use the emergency decree, if there is more chaos or violence,” Surapong said yesterday.
Elections ‘for Sure’
The Election Commission has urged the government to defer the vote until May, saying the political environment is too tense to proceed next month. The government, police and military are united in efforts to prevent violence and to ensure the election goes ahead, Yingluck said Jan. 17.
“The elections will take place for sure,” Surapong said. “It’s the EC’s job to make it happen.”
Suthep’s former party, the Democrats, have lost every national election over the past two decades and plan to boycott next month’s poll.
Yingluck dissolved parliament Dec. 9 and announced the election, a day after the Democrats resigned en masse to join the demonstrations, which at their peak drew more than 200,000 people. Protesters initially took to the streets to oppose a proposed amnesty law that they said would benefit Thaksin, which the government later abandoned. The demonstrations later morphed into a broader movement to erase Thaksin’s political influence.
Surapong on Jan. 17 said supporters of Thaksin, known as red shirts, won’t confront rival protesters in Bangkok. More than 90 people were killed in 2010 when Suthep and Abhisit Vejjajiva, who was prime minister at the time, set up live-fire zones and ordered the army to disperse pro-Thaksin red shirts occupying Bangkok’s shopping district.
“The government wants to ask all parties not to use violence,” Yingluck said yesterday. “We have to consider how our nation can move forward. An election is important to the maintenance of democracy because confidence will evaporate if we don’t accept the rules.”
To contact the reporters on this story: Supunnabul Suwannakij in Bangkok at ssuwannakij@bloomberg.net; Suttinee Yuvejwattana in Bangkok at suttinee1@bloomberg.net
Two grenades exploded at a demonstration site in central Bangkok on Jan. 19, injuring 28, and a grenade attack on a protest rally on Jan. 17 killed one person and wounded 40 others, according to the Bangkok Emergency Medical Center.
Violence is increasing as Suthep Thaugsuban, a former opposition party lawmaker, steps up efforts to oust Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra before an election on Feb. 2. Suthep wants the government replaced with an unelected council that would change laws to prevent parties linked to Yingluck’s brother, former premier Thaksin Shinawatra, returning to power.
“People who incite violence should understand that the losses will create hatred,” army Chief Prayuth Chan-Ocha said yesterday. “I’m concerned this will make people lose trust in officials, and they will try to get the military involved.”
The risk of Thailand defaulting on its debt has risen to the highest since June 2012. The benchmark SET Index (SET) of stocks fell 0.4 percent yesterday and has slumped about 10 percent since the start of demonstrations at the end of October. The baht has retreated about 5 percent in that period.
‘Painful Period’
The government is assessing whether to declare a state of emergency to combat the violence, Yingluck said. The emergency decree bans gatherings of more than five people, allows detention without charge and gives soldiers immunity from prosecution. Suthep faces murder charges stemming from a 2010 military crackdown on pro-Thaksin demonstrators when he was deputy prime minister, the last time a state of emergency was used to combat political violence in the capital.
“I don’t want to go back to the painful period of 2010,” Prayuth said. “But the situation today is different. The situation hasn’t reached that point, so soldiers can’t come out to do anything. Everything depends on the situation.”
Thailand has had nine coups and more than 20 prime ministers since 1946. Prayuth earlier this month said that the “door” to a coup is neither open nor closed, raising speculation the army may step in if protests become violent.
Suthep’s critics have said he aims to create enough turmoil to spur the intervention of the military in a repeat of a 2006 coup that toppled Thaksin, whose allies have won the past five elections on support from rural northern and northeastern regions.
‘More Chaos’
The protesters, mostly middle-class Bangkokians and Democrat party supporters from southern provinces, say Yingluck’s government is illegitimate and run from abroad by Thaksin, who faces a two-year jail term for corruption if he returns in a case he says was politically motivated.
Nine people have been killed since anti-government protests began Oct. 31, including a man who died from injuries sustained in a Jan. 17 grenade attack on a protest march near Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University. Suthep blamed the government for the attack, while Foreign Minister Surapong Tovichakchaikul questioned a decision by organizers to change the rally route without giving the police enough time to ensure it was safe.
“It’s possible that we will use the emergency decree, if there is more chaos or violence,” Surapong said yesterday.
Elections ‘for Sure’
The Election Commission has urged the government to defer the vote until May, saying the political environment is too tense to proceed next month. The government, police and military are united in efforts to prevent violence and to ensure the election goes ahead, Yingluck said Jan. 17.
“The elections will take place for sure,” Surapong said. “It’s the EC’s job to make it happen.”
Suthep’s former party, the Democrats, have lost every national election over the past two decades and plan to boycott next month’s poll.
Yingluck dissolved parliament Dec. 9 and announced the election, a day after the Democrats resigned en masse to join the demonstrations, which at their peak drew more than 200,000 people. Protesters initially took to the streets to oppose a proposed amnesty law that they said would benefit Thaksin, which the government later abandoned. The demonstrations later morphed into a broader movement to erase Thaksin’s political influence.
Surapong on Jan. 17 said supporters of Thaksin, known as red shirts, won’t confront rival protesters in Bangkok. More than 90 people were killed in 2010 when Suthep and Abhisit Vejjajiva, who was prime minister at the time, set up live-fire zones and ordered the army to disperse pro-Thaksin red shirts occupying Bangkok’s shopping district.
“The government wants to ask all parties not to use violence,” Yingluck said yesterday. “We have to consider how our nation can move forward. An election is important to the maintenance of democracy because confidence will evaporate if we don’t accept the rules.”
To contact the reporters on this story: Supunnabul Suwannakij in Bangkok at ssuwannakij@bloomberg.net; Suttinee Yuvejwattana in Bangkok at suttinee1@bloomberg.net
Labels:
World News
Thai Protest Blasts Injure 28 Ahead of Planned Election
At least 28 people were injured as two explosions rocked a protest site in Bangkok yesterday, adding to almost daily attacks as groups push to oust Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra and derail a Feb. 2 election.
The afternoon blasts occurred at Victory Monument, one of seven key districts that have been blockaded by demonstrators in the capital since Jan. 13, according to the Bangkok Emergency Medical Center. Violence over the past three days has killed one and wounded 67, the center said on its website.
Suthep Thaugsuban, a former opposition party lawmaker, is escalating efforts to cause chaos in the capital to destabilize Yingluck’s administration. He wants the government replaced with an unelected council that would change laws to prevent parties linked to former premier Thaksin Shinawatra returning to power, risking a backlash from some of the 15 million people who voted for Thaksin’s sister in the 2011 election.
“The government will try to prevent encounters between groups that support and oppose the election because the people who want it to go ahead are becoming more active,” National Security Council head Paradorn Pattanatabut told reporters yesterday. Growing numbers of people have joined candle-light vigils in Bangkok in recent days, adopting “respect my vote” as the movement’s slogan and calling for an end to violence.
Photographer: Dario Pignatelli/Bloomberg
Protesters walk with a giant Thai flag during demonstrations at Lumpini Park in Bangkok... Read More
Suthep’s critics have said he aims to create enough turmoil to spur the intervention of the military in a repeat of a 2006 coup that toppled Thaksin, whose allies have won the past five elections on support from rural northern and northeastern regions. The protesters, mostly middle-class Bangkokians and Democrat party supporters from southern provinces, say Yingluck’s government is illegitimate and run from abroad by Thaksin, who faces a two-year jail term for corruption if he returns in a case he says was politically motivated.
Grenade Attack
Nine people have been killed since anti-government protests began Oct. 31, including a man who died from injuries sustained in a Jan. 17 grenade attack on a protest march near Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University. Suthep blamed the government for the attack, while Foreign Minister Surapong Tovichakchaikul questioned a decision by organizers to change the rally route without giving the police enough time to ensure it was safe.
“A group of people with evil intentions joined the protests and tried to create a situation to defame the government,” Surapong said yesterday, after the police found that the grenade was thrown from among the protesters.
United Front
The government will tighten security in Bangkok and Thailand’s southern provinces as it seeks to avoid clashes between anti-government protesters and the growing number of groups that support the election, NSC head Paradorn said.
The government, police and military are united in efforts to prevent the protests turning violent and to ensure the election goes ahead, Yingluck said Jan. 17.
An election is “the only way that we can hear the people,” Yingluck said, while repeating that she is open to talks with demonstrators. The Election Commission has urged the government to defer the vote until May, saying the political environment is too tense to proceed next month.
Rice Payments
The protesters plan to rally outside the headquarters of the Government Savings Bank today, Suthep told supporters late yesterday, adding that state-owned lenders should withhold support for the government’s rice-purchase program. He also called for supporters outside Bangkok to close down government offices in Thailand’s provinces.
Suthep’s former party, the Democrats, have lost every national election over the past two decades and plan to boycott the poll. Overseas voting started yesterday, according to the foreign ministry’s website.
Yingluck dissolved parliament Dec. 9 and announced the election, a day after the Democrats resigned en masse to join the demonstrations, which at their peak drew more than 200,000 people. Protesters initially took to the streets to oppose a proposed amnesty law that they said would benefit Thaksin, which the government later abandoned. The demonstrations later morphed into a broader movement to erase Thaksin’s political influence.
Surapong on Jan. 17 said supporters of Thaksin, known as red shirts, won’t confront rival protesters in Bangkok. “They try to protest or show their support outside the Bangkok area, so I think civil war will not happen,” he said.
More than 90 people were killed in 2010 when Suthep and Abhisit Vejjajiva, who was prime minister at the time, set up live fire zones and ordered the army to disperse pro-Thaksin red shirts occupying Bangkok’s shopping district.
“The prime minister has reiterated to security personnel to exercise restraint at all times and has instructed them to perform their duties in line with international standards as well as not to use any weapons,” Surapong said.
The afternoon blasts occurred at Victory Monument, one of seven key districts that have been blockaded by demonstrators in the capital since Jan. 13, according to the Bangkok Emergency Medical Center. Violence over the past three days has killed one and wounded 67, the center said on its website.
Suthep Thaugsuban, a former opposition party lawmaker, is escalating efforts to cause chaos in the capital to destabilize Yingluck’s administration. He wants the government replaced with an unelected council that would change laws to prevent parties linked to former premier Thaksin Shinawatra returning to power, risking a backlash from some of the 15 million people who voted for Thaksin’s sister in the 2011 election.
“The government will try to prevent encounters between groups that support and oppose the election because the people who want it to go ahead are becoming more active,” National Security Council head Paradorn Pattanatabut told reporters yesterday. Growing numbers of people have joined candle-light vigils in Bangkok in recent days, adopting “respect my vote” as the movement’s slogan and calling for an end to violence.
Photographer: Dario Pignatelli/Bloomberg
Protesters walk with a giant Thai flag during demonstrations at Lumpini Park in Bangkok... Read More
Suthep’s critics have said he aims to create enough turmoil to spur the intervention of the military in a repeat of a 2006 coup that toppled Thaksin, whose allies have won the past five elections on support from rural northern and northeastern regions. The protesters, mostly middle-class Bangkokians and Democrat party supporters from southern provinces, say Yingluck’s government is illegitimate and run from abroad by Thaksin, who faces a two-year jail term for corruption if he returns in a case he says was politically motivated.
Grenade Attack
Nine people have been killed since anti-government protests began Oct. 31, including a man who died from injuries sustained in a Jan. 17 grenade attack on a protest march near Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University. Suthep blamed the government for the attack, while Foreign Minister Surapong Tovichakchaikul questioned a decision by organizers to change the rally route without giving the police enough time to ensure it was safe.
“A group of people with evil intentions joined the protests and tried to create a situation to defame the government,” Surapong said yesterday, after the police found that the grenade was thrown from among the protesters.
United Front
The government will tighten security in Bangkok and Thailand’s southern provinces as it seeks to avoid clashes between anti-government protesters and the growing number of groups that support the election, NSC head Paradorn said.
The government, police and military are united in efforts to prevent the protests turning violent and to ensure the election goes ahead, Yingluck said Jan. 17.
An election is “the only way that we can hear the people,” Yingluck said, while repeating that she is open to talks with demonstrators. The Election Commission has urged the government to defer the vote until May, saying the political environment is too tense to proceed next month.
Rice Payments
The protesters plan to rally outside the headquarters of the Government Savings Bank today, Suthep told supporters late yesterday, adding that state-owned lenders should withhold support for the government’s rice-purchase program. He also called for supporters outside Bangkok to close down government offices in Thailand’s provinces.
Suthep’s former party, the Democrats, have lost every national election over the past two decades and plan to boycott the poll. Overseas voting started yesterday, according to the foreign ministry’s website.
Yingluck dissolved parliament Dec. 9 and announced the election, a day after the Democrats resigned en masse to join the demonstrations, which at their peak drew more than 200,000 people. Protesters initially took to the streets to oppose a proposed amnesty law that they said would benefit Thaksin, which the government later abandoned. The demonstrations later morphed into a broader movement to erase Thaksin’s political influence.
Surapong on Jan. 17 said supporters of Thaksin, known as red shirts, won’t confront rival protesters in Bangkok. “They try to protest or show their support outside the Bangkok area, so I think civil war will not happen,” he said.
More than 90 people were killed in 2010 when Suthep and Abhisit Vejjajiva, who was prime minister at the time, set up live fire zones and ordered the army to disperse pro-Thaksin red shirts occupying Bangkok’s shopping district.
“The prime minister has reiterated to security personnel to exercise restraint at all times and has instructed them to perform their duties in line with international standards as well as not to use any weapons,” Surapong said.
Labels:
World News
Another daytime bomb attack injures 28
The Victory Monument rally site was rocked by two grenades today, wounding 28, the second such attack in two days The bombs were of the same type as the one used in yesterday's bombing and this time there is a clear CCTV image of the assailant.
For a second time in two days People's Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) protesters have been hit by a brazen daytime bombing attack. This one took place at the Victory Monument almost exactly 24 hours after yesterday's attack on marchers at Banthat Thong road and involved two hand grenades
This time, CCTV cameras at the site captured very clear images on the assailant Police say the hand grenades used in today's attack used in the attacks are of the same type, Chinese or Russian made.
Two grenade safety levers and a grenade safety pin were found at the scene and this should significantly aid the investigation
Altogether 28 people were injured, including Sithinee Huangnak, a female Post Today reporter. Seven were reported to be in serious condition
One of the victims still clearly in shock after the bombing. PHRAKRIT JUNTAWONG
Thaworn Senneam, a former Democrat MP and core PDRC co-leader in charge at the Victory Monument rally base said an unidentified man threw an explosive device near a press centre tent behind the rally stage and ran off at about 1.30pm. He said he believed the bomb was intended for him, but it hit a tree. The man was chased by security guards and protesters prompting him to toss another bomb.
But the group continued to try to catch him and the man fired a shot at them, leaving one person injured, before fleeing on a motorcycle driven by another man, heading toward Tuek Chai intersection
Meanwhile, new information has emerged on yesterday bombing incident at Banthat Thong road which killed on marcher and injured 37 more. Pol Maj Gen Adul Narongsak, deputy chief of the Metropolitan Police, says a close examation of the CCTV video footage of the incident reveals clear two suspects
The two men people suspect were involved in yesterday's bombing incident at Banthat Thong Road.
Watch at the back of the crowd to the left of vehicle where the bomb explodes. At about the 9 second mark, you will see a man in white cap walk quickly to the side of the road, where Pol Maj Gen Adul says he hid himself behind an iron box containing telephone circuit boards. Then at the 18-second, after the bomb explodes, a man in black, opens the door of the vehicle and runs to the same spot. Shortly later they come out and, ignoring the victims the man in the white cap picks something off the ground.
For Deputy Prime Minister Surapong Tovichakchaikul, who is in charge of Centre for the Administration of Peace and Order (Capo), this was enough to indicate the someone connected with the PDRC staged the event, aiming to blame it on the government.
Clearly this is going to be a very interesting investigation
Update (22:15) The driver of the vehicle, the man seen running away, just appeared on the PDRC stage at Pathumwan. I know that he flatly denied throwing the grenade but at this time I don't have any more information of what he said. Here is what he looks like.
The man said to be the driver of the vehicle where the bombing took place. From Blue Sky via @ohohcita
If you are interest, there is a better photo and more information on Kanok Ratwongsakul's Facebook page. Two men spoke on the Pathumwan stage one who whom was in the back of the vehicle and fell down from the blast. Hopefully, there will be a video clip of what they said, so we can get full details.
Labels:
World News